The division and isolation of several legal areas can result in a limited understanding of justice. Any case can be impacted by any other law area case, and this is understandable only if we see the law connected between the different areas like communicating vessels. This constrained viewpoint makes it necessary for the legal representatives to work together on a case, making necessary the creation of multiple areas law offices or law firms, which is not intrinsically undesirable. However, when judges adopt such a constrained interpretation of the law, it creates an issue. This is especially true in family law issues, which can develop into extremely complicated situations involving numerous legal disciplines.
The process can be extremely unpleasant for the children—those for whom the law is intended—because family courts must make decisions in cases involving child custody disputes, parental rights that have been suspended, or situations where a kid is kept in a facility for the duration of the case.
This happens within the strict confines of a court system, like the one in Germany, where every unique matter must be heard by a different court. What happens to the youngster throughout these processes? The child or children are transferred between institutions, examined by "qualified" individuals who have access to every part of their lives and interact with their teachers, coaches, doctors, friends, and possibly even neighbors, who are subjected to visits by those “qualified” individuals.
Family law can be complex and involve many different legal disciplines, such as but not limited to family law, immigration law, criminal law, and international law. The intricacy highlights the necessity for a comprehensive approach to legal interpretation and decision-making, one that takes into account the complex nature of legal issues and places a priority on the welfare of the children.
